When it comes to adapting Barrie’s story of a fantastic
land where children never grow up, the aspect that just about everyone stumbles
on is the portrayal of his Native American characters, who even in the original
story suffer from the influences of colonialism and racism. Jodi Anderson
attempts to not only tackle a new vision of Neverland’s native residents but
put them in the spotlight as a culture and a collage of diverse characters.
That doesn’t spare her from some deserved criticism of the stereotypes and
caricatures she employs, as better dissected by Debbie Reese in her review of
the book. Forgive my willingness to leave the problematic elements to the
scrutiny of critics with a better grasp of the prevailing racial issues in
Western literature that Tiger Lily reflects.
I’ve honestly struggled to post this review out of fear that I wasn’t giving
the Native American portrayals their due analysis, as my own knowledge on the
subject is limited. For anyone interested, you can read Reese’s article here,
and I recommend you do. I’ll mostly stick to assessing the story elements on
the whole.
Anderson employs first-person narrative, but not from Tiger
Lily’s perspective. Instead, Tinker Bell acts as the Nick Caraway equivalent,
and then some. As a fairy no bigger than a firefly, Tink frequently follows
Tiger around. Why? Isn’t Tink more interested in Peter Pan? Unlike her original
counterpart, this Tinker Bell first develops a one-sided friendship with the
protagonist, intrigued by Tiger’s mysterious origins, stoic exterior and
layered soul. Her feelings for Peter come later and do temporarily meet at
cross-purposes with her attachment to Tiger, but again, unlike the original
Tink, her jealousy does not overwhelm her caring nature. Some fans of the petty
and sometimes malicious fairy of Barrie’s creation might find Anderson’s
version too soft; personally I enjoyed her insight into the various characters.
I’m all about building characters, and while I appreciate that the spirit and
general rules of Barrie’s universe are respected, a hardcore purist I am not.
Along with familiar faces from the story many people know,
the novel introduces some new characters, mostly from Tiger Lily’s tribe. The
most memorable are Tik Tok, Tiger’s adopted guardian, and Pine Sap, a
disfigured boy who befriends her, if for no other reason than that they’re both
pushed to the fringes of society by their strangeness. I honestly thought Tik
Tok would somehow turn into the crocodile who takes Hook’s hand, but in fact he
takes the name from the mechanism he found from a shipwreck. Despite being the
respected shaman in the village, he is likewise an outsider for his eccentricities,
the most prominent being his love of the foreign objects that wash up on shore
from other lands and his fluid sexual identity. Gender is a struggle for Tiger,
too, although more when she’s comparing herself with other girls such as Moon
Eye, her one other friend, and eventually Wendy Darling. That Peter ends up
rejecting Tiger in favor of Wendy’s more traditional femininity is painful to
watch; even more devastating is what happens to Tik Tok when Philip, the
Englishman Tiger Lily saves, turns the tribe against him. This too presents a
problematic message, that even while Tik Tok garners sympathy, he’s doomed to a
tragic end because of his unconventional identity, and there’s no other
character in his predicament who lands a happy ending. The injustice will move
you and may well remind you of the many times a queer character has been
dispatched for the sake of drama or to address issues of intolerance. Such a
message is important, but just as Anderson falls into the same traps as many
writers addressing racism without fully exploring or expressing its devastating
repercussions, she doesn’t attempt to change the typical narrative of queer
characters even as she engages their pathos.
There’s marginal room for forgiveness, in my view, due to
this being a YA novel. It’s hard to unpack these topics in a way that won’t
overwhelm young people who picked up Tiger
Lily out of fondness for the book, the play, or the movies they grew up
loving. That said, writers in the genre should be willing to push boundaries
and bring these heavy issues to young readers’ attention in a context they can
relate to. In fantasy especially, that’s a tall but not unfulfillable order. I
still think Anderson’s work is worth a read through how it draws you into its
vivid characters, lush world and heartfelt voice—so long as the flaws are
recognized, too.
Rating:
3.5/5

No comments:
Post a Comment